Render vs Vercel
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
|
R
Render
|
 Vercel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational Best | Partial Outage |
| Uptime (30d) | 100.000% Best | 0.000% |
| Uptime (90d) | 100.000% Best | 0.000% |
| MTTR | 1.7 hrs Best | N/A |
| Incidents (30d) | 3 | 2 Best |
| Incidents (90d) | 3 | 2 Best |
| Reliability Score | 87.5/100 Best | 60.0/100 |
Recent Incidents
Vercel
Elevated Build Errors
major
Render
Degraded builds and deployments in the Singapore region
minor
Render
Degraded builds and deployments in the Singapore region
minor
Render
Custom domains are unable to be created
major
Vercel
Dubai region (dxb1) is unavailable and traffic is being re-routed
major
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, Render or Vercel?
Based on our monitoring data, Render is currently more reliable than Vercel. Render has a reliability score of 87.5/100 compared to Vercel's 60.0/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, Render or Vercel?
Over the last 30 days, Render has a higher uptime of 100.000% compared to Vercel's 0.000%. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is Render more stable than Vercel?
Vercel has been more stable over the past 90 days with 2 incidents compared to Render's 3 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both Render and Vercel with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring