AWS Lambda vs Render
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 AWS Lambda
|
R
Render
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | 1.7 hrs Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 3 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 3 |
| Reliability Score | 100.0/100 Best | 87.5/100 |
Recent Incidents
Render
Degraded builds and deployments in the Singapore region
minor
Render
Degraded builds and deployments in the Singapore region
minor
Render
Custom domains are unable to be created
major
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, AWS Lambda or Render?
Based on our monitoring data, AWS Lambda is currently more reliable than Render. AWS Lambda has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Render's 87.5/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, AWS Lambda or Render?
Over the last 30 days, Render has a higher uptime of 100.000% compared to AWS Lambda's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is AWS Lambda more stable than Render?
AWS Lambda has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Render's 3 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both AWS Lambda and Render with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring