Quicknode vs Thirdweb
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 Quicknode
|
 Thirdweb
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Maintenance | Operational Best |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 99.202% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 99.202% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | 43 min Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 4 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 4 |
| Reliability Score | N/A | 84.5/100 Best |
Recent Incidents
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, Quicknode or Thirdweb?
Based on our monitoring data, Thirdweb is currently more reliable than Quicknode. Thirdweb has a reliability score of 84.5/100 compared to Quicknode's N/A. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, Quicknode or Thirdweb?
Over the last 30 days, Thirdweb has a higher uptime of 99.202% compared to Quicknode's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is Quicknode more stable than Thirdweb?
Quicknode has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Thirdweb's 4 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both Quicknode and Thirdweb with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring