Dune vs Thirdweb
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 Dune
|
 Thirdweb
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Unknown | Operational Best |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 99.800% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 99.449% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | 43 min Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 5 | 0 Best |
| Incidents (90d) | 5 | 4 Best |
| Reliability Score | N/A | 97.5/100 Best |
Recent Incidents
Dune
We do not ingest new arbitrum blocks
Dune
Data on Rise testnet is stale since January 15th
Dune
Delayed data on NEAR balances and circulating_supply tables
Dune
Thorchain data is lagging behind by 3 days
Dune
Select curated data models are stale.
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Thirdweb
Service Degradation & Increased Error Rates
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, Dune or Thirdweb?
Based on our monitoring data, Thirdweb is currently more reliable than Dune. Thirdweb has a reliability score of 97.5/100 compared to Dune's N/A. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, Dune or Thirdweb?
Over the last 30 days, Thirdweb has a higher uptime of 99.800% compared to Dune's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is Dune more stable than Thirdweb?
Thirdweb has been more stable over the past 90 days with 4 incidents compared to Dune's 5 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both Dune and Thirdweb with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring