PlanetScale vs Supabase
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 PlanetScale
|
 Supabase
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (30d) | 100.000% | 100.000% |
| Uptime (90d) | 100.000% | 100.000% |
| MTTR | N/A | 1.4 hrs Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 5 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 5 |
| Reliability Score | 100.0/100 Best | 87.5/100 |
Recent Incidents
Supabase
Increased error rate related to Connection Pooler in ap-northeast-2 (South Korea)
minor
Supabase
Degraded Logging Ingestion impacting all regions
minor
Supabase
Projects failing to be created
major
Supabase
Storage errors in eu-central-2
minor
Supabase
Storage errors in EU-Central-2
minor
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, PlanetScale or Supabase?
Based on our monitoring data, PlanetScale is currently more reliable than Supabase. PlanetScale has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Supabase's 87.5/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, PlanetScale or Supabase?
Both PlanetScale and Supabase have comparable uptime over the last 30 days. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions. Sign up for Happy Uptime to get instant alerts when either service experiences downtime.
Is PlanetScale more stable than Supabase?
PlanetScale has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Supabase's 5 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both PlanetScale and Supabase with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring