Neon vs Supabase
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
|
N
Neon
|
 Supabase
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | 1.4 hrs Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 5 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 5 |
| Reliability Score | 100.0/100 Best | 87.5/100 |
Recent Incidents
Supabase
Increased error rate related to Connection Pooler in ap-northeast-2 (South Korea)
minor
Supabase
Degraded Logging Ingestion impacting all regions
minor
Supabase
Projects failing to be created
major
Supabase
Storage errors in eu-central-2
minor
Supabase
Storage errors in EU-Central-2
minor
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, Neon or Supabase?
Based on our monitoring data, Neon is currently more reliable than Supabase. Neon has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Supabase's 87.5/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, Neon or Supabase?
Over the last 30 days, Supabase has a higher uptime of 100.000% compared to Neon's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is Neon more stable than Supabase?
Neon has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Supabase's 5 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both Neon and Supabase with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring