Microsoft Azure vs Heroku
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 Microsoft Azure
|
H
Heroku
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (30d) | 97.685% Best | N/A |
| Uptime (90d) | 98.250% Best | N/A |
| MTTR | 6.6 hrs Best | N/A |
| Incidents (30d) | 1 | 0 Best |
| Incidents (90d) | 3 | 0 Best |
| Reliability Score | 59.1/100 | 100.0/100 Best |
Recent Incidents
Microsoft Azure
Active - Multiservice impact for Azure Workloads in East US
Microsoft Azure
Mitigated - Multiple Azure Services Experienced Degraded Service in East US
Microsoft Azure
Mitigated - Multiple Azure Services Experienced Degraded Services in East US
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, Microsoft Azure or Heroku?
Based on our monitoring data, Heroku is currently more reliable than Microsoft Azure. Heroku has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Microsoft Azure's 59.1/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, Microsoft Azure or Heroku?
Over the last 30 days, Microsoft Azure has a higher uptime of 97.685% compared to Heroku's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is Microsoft Azure more stable than Heroku?
Heroku has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Microsoft Azure's 3 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both Microsoft Azure and Heroku with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring