AWS RDS vs Fly.io
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 AWS RDS
|
F
Fly.io
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | 58 min Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 3 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 3 |
| Reliability Score | 100.0/100 Best | 93.8/100 |
Recent Incidents
Fly.io
Sprites Operations: 401 errors for certain organizations
none
Fly.io
Sprite Operations: 401 errors for certain organizations
none
Fly.io
Setting secrets and creating apps is degraded
none
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, AWS RDS or Fly.io?
Based on our monitoring data, AWS RDS is currently more reliable than Fly.io. AWS RDS has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Fly.io's 93.8/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, AWS RDS or Fly.io?
Over the last 30 days, Fly.io has a higher uptime of 100.000% compared to AWS RDS's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is AWS RDS more stable than Fly.io?
AWS RDS has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Fly.io's 3 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both AWS RDS and Fly.io with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring