AWS CloudFront vs Netlify
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 AWS CloudFront
|
 Netlify
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 100.000% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | 2.1 hrs Best |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 3 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 3 |
| Reliability Score | 100.0/100 Best | 81.3/100 |
Recent Incidents
Netlify
Increased errors on High Performance Edge in Mumbai region
minor
Netlify
Service disruption for Netlify application, builds & API
major
Netlify
Service disruption for Netlify application, sites, builds & API
major
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, AWS CloudFront or Netlify?
Based on our monitoring data, AWS CloudFront is currently more reliable than Netlify. AWS CloudFront has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Netlify's 81.3/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, AWS CloudFront or Netlify?
Over the last 30 days, Netlify has a higher uptime of 100.000% compared to AWS CloudFront's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is AWS CloudFront more stable than Netlify?
AWS CloudFront has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Netlify's 3 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both AWS CloudFront and Netlify with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring