AWS CloudFront vs Google Cloud Platform
Reliability comparison based on uptime, incident history, and mean time to recovery. Updated daily.
 AWS CloudFront
|
 Google Cloud Platform
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational Best | Degraded |
| Uptime (30d) | N/A | 86.818% Best |
| Uptime (90d) | N/A | 95.057% Best |
| MTTR | N/A | N/A |
| Incidents (30d) | 0 Best | 1 |
| Incidents (90d) | 0 Best | 1 |
| Reliability Score | 100.0/100 Best | 79.8/100 |
Recent Incidents
Google Cloud Platform
Network traffic to Google Cloud originating from Delhi, Chennai, Mumbai and surrounding areas is experiencing intermittent periods of elevated latency and possible packet loss.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, AWS CloudFront or Google Cloud Platform?
Based on our monitoring data, AWS CloudFront is currently more reliable than Google Cloud Platform. AWS CloudFront has a reliability score of 100.0/100 compared to Google Cloud Platform's 79.8/100. This score factors in uptime percentage, mean time to recovery, incident frequency, and consistency. Monitor both services with Happy Uptime for real-time alerts.
Which has better uptime, AWS CloudFront or Google Cloud Platform?
Over the last 30 days, Google Cloud Platform has a higher uptime of 86.818% compared to AWS CloudFront's N/A. We check both services every 5 minutes from multiple global regions.
Is AWS CloudFront more stable than Google Cloud Platform?
AWS CloudFront has been more stable over the past 90 days with 0 incidents compared to Google Cloud Platform's 1 incidents. Fewer incidents generally indicates a more stable service. Use Happy Uptime to track both services and get AI-powered incident analysis.
Monitor both AWS CloudFront and Google Cloud Platform with Happy Uptime
Instant alerts when services go down. Dependency tracking, AI incident analysis, and status pages. Free to start.
Start Free Monitoring